JMIR Formative Research (Mar 2024)

Comparison of the Discrimination Performance of AI Scoring and the Brixia Score in Predicting COVID-19 Severity on Chest X-Ray Imaging: Diagnostic Accuracy Study

  • Eric Daniel Tenda,
  • Reyhan Eddy Yunus,
  • Benny Zulkarnaen,
  • Muhammad Reynalzi Yugo,
  • Ceva Wicaksono Pitoyo,
  • Moses Mazmur Asaf,
  • Tiara Nur Islamiyati,
  • Arierta Pujitresnani,
  • Andry Setiadharma,
  • Joshua Henrina,
  • Cleopas Martin Rumende,
  • Vally Wulani,
  • Kuntjoro Harimurti,
  • Aida Lydia,
  • Hamzah Shatri,
  • Pradana Soewondo,
  • Prasandhya Astagiri Yusuf

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/46817
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8
p. e46817

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe artificial intelligence (AI) analysis of chest x-rays can increase the precision of binary COVID-19 diagnosis. However, it is unknown if AI-based chest x-rays can predict who will develop severe COVID-19, especially in low- and middle-income countries. ObjectiveThe study aims to compare the performance of human radiologist Brixia scores versus 2 AI scoring systems in predicting the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia. MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional study of 300 patients suspected with and with confirmed COVID-19 infection in Jakarta, Indonesia. A total of 2 AI scores were generated using CAD4COVID x-ray software. ResultsThe AI probability score had slightly lower discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] 0.787, 95% CI 0.722-0.852). The AI score for the affected lung area (AUC 0.857, 95% CI 0.809-0.905) was almost as good as the human Brixia score (AUC 0.863, 95% CI 0.818-0.908). ConclusionsThe AI score for the affected lung area and the human radiologist Brixia score had similar and good discrimination performance in predicting COVID-19 severity. Our study demonstrated that using AI-based diagnostic tools is possible, even in low-resource settings. However, before it is widely adopted in daily practice, more studies with a larger scale and that are prospective in nature are needed to confirm our findings.