BMC Geriatrics (Oct 2021)

Convalescent plasma treatment for patients of 80 years and older with COVID-19 pneumonia

  • Iñigo Romon,
  • Juan J. Dominguez-Garcia,
  • Jose L. Arroyo,
  • Borja Suberviola,
  • Itxasne Cabezón,
  • Beatriz Abascal,
  • Cristina Baldeón,
  • Amalia Cuesta,
  • Raquel Portilla,
  • Elena Casuso,
  • Enrique Ocio,
  • Montserrat Briz

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02447-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Older patients, frequently with multiple comorbidities, have a high mortality from COVID-19 infection. Convalescent plasma (CP) is a therapeutic option for these patients. Our objective is to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of CP treatment in this population group. Methods Forty one patients over 80 years old with COVID-19 pneumonia received CP added to standard treatment, 51.2% with high anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers and 48.8% with low titers. Median time between the onset of symptoms and the infusion of plasma was 7 days (IQR 4–10). A similar group of 82 patients who received only standard treatment, during a period in which CP was not available, were selected as a control group. Results In-hospital mortality was 26.8% for controls and 14.6% for CP patients (P = 0.131) and ICU admission was 8.5% for controls and 4.9% for CP patients (P = 0.467). Mortality tended to be lower in the high-titer group (9.5%) than in the low-titer group (20%), and in patients transfused within the first 7 days of symptom onset (10%) than in patients transfused later (19.1%), although the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.307 and P = 0.355 respectively). There was no difference in the length of hospitalization. No significant adverse events were associated with CP treatment. Conclusions Convalescent plasma treatment in patients over 80 years old with COVID-19 pneumonia was well tolerated but did not present a statistically significant difference in hospital mortality, ICU admission, or length of hospitalization. The results should be interpreted with caution as only half the patients received high-titer CP and the small number of patients included in the study limits the statistical power to detect significant differences. Trial registration CEIm Cantabria # 2020.127.

Keywords