Comparison of Mixed Reality-Assisted Spinal Puncture with Landmark-Guided Spinal Puncture by Novice Practitioners: A Pilot Study

Abstract

Lei Gao,1,2,* Yidi Xu,1,2,* Xixue Zhang,1,2 Zhaoshun Jiang,1,2 Jiajun Wu,1,2 Yanjun Dong,1,2 Ming Li,3 Liang Jin,3 Jianjian Qiu,4 Lijue You,5 Chunhui Qin,6 Weidong Gu1,2 1Department of Anaesthesiology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2Shanghai Key Laboratory of Clinical Geriatric Medicine, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Radiology, Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 4Department of Radiation Oncology, Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Computer Center, Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 6Department of Pain Management, Yueyang Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Weidong Gu, Email [email protected]: Performing spinal anaesthesia in elderly patients with ligament calcification or hyperostosis is challenging for novice practitioners. This pilot study aimed to compare the effectiveness of mixed reality-assisted spinal puncture (MRasp) with that of landmark-guided spinal puncture (LGsp) by novice practitioners in elderly patients.Methods: In this pilot study, 36 patients (aged ≥ 65 years) scheduled for elective surgery under spinal anaesthesia by anaesthesiology residents were included. Patients were randomly assigned to the MRasp group (n = 18) or the LGsp group (n = 18). The outcomes included the number of needle insertion attempts, redirection attempts, passes, the rate of successful first-attempt needle insertion, the rate of successful first needle pass, the spinal puncture time, the total procedure time, and the incidence of perioperative complications.Results: The median number of needle insertion attempts was significantly fewer in the MRasp group than in the LGsp group (1.0 vs 2.0, P = 0.023). The proportion of patients with successful first-attempt needle insertion was 72.2% in the MRasp group and 44.4% in the LGsp group (P = 0.176). The incidence of perioperative complications did not significantly differ between the two groups.Conclusion: This pilot study found that novice practitioners made significantly fewer needle insertion attempts in the MRasp group compared to the LGsp group when performing spinal anaesthesia on elderly patients. A future randomized controlled trial (RCT) is warranted to validate its effectiveness.Trial Registration: This trial was registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=178960 (ChiCTR-IPR-2300068520). Public title: Mixed reality-assisted versus landmark-guided spinal puncture in elderly patients: a randomized controlled pilot study. Principal investigator: Lei Gao. The registration date was February 22, 2023. The date of the first participant enrolment was February 27, 2023.Plain Language Summary: We developed virtual spine-presenting technology and patented optimal trajectory design technology to assist in spinal puncture and reported that the median number of needle insertion attempts was significantly fewer in the mixed reality-assisted spinal puncture group than in the landmark-guided spinal puncture group.Keywords: augmented reality, computer simulation, mixed reality, spinal puncture

Keywords

• augmented reality
• computer simulation
• mixed reality
• spinal puncture