Acta Neuropathologica Communications (Jun 2019)

Predictive MGMT status in a homogeneous cohort of IDH wildtype glioblastoma patients

  • Josefine Radke,
  • Arend Koch,
  • Fabienne Pritsch,
  • Elisa Schumann,
  • Martin Misch,
  • Claudia Hempt,
  • Klaus Lenz,
  • Franziska Löbel,
  • Fabienne Paschereit,
  • Frank L. Heppner,
  • Peter Vajkoczy,
  • Randi Koll,
  • Julia Onken

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-019-0745-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Methylation of the O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter is predictive for treatment response in glioblastoma patients. However, precise predictive cutoff values to distinguish “MGMT methylated” from “MGMT unmethylated” patients remain highly debated in terms of pyrosequencing (PSQ) analysis. We retrospectively analyzed a clinically and molecularly very well-characterized cohort of 111 IDH wildtype glioblastoma patients, who underwent gross total tumor resection and received standard Stupp treatment. Detailed clinical parameters were obtained. Predictive cutoff values for MGMT promoter methylation were determined using ROC curve analysis and survival curve comparison using Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. MGMT status was analyzed using pyrosequencing (PSQ), semi-quantitative methylation specific PCR (sqMSP) and direct bisulfite sequencing (dBiSeq). Highly methylated (> 20%) MGMT correlated with significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in our cohort. Median PFS was 7.2 months in the unmethylated group (UM, 20% mean methylation). Median OS was 13.4 months for UM, 17.9 months for LM and 29.93 months for HM. Within the LM group, correlation of PSQ and sqMSP or dBiSeq was only conclusive in 51.5% of our cases. ROC curve analysis revealed superior test precision for survival if additional sqMSP results were considered (AUC = 0.76) compared to PSQ (cutoff 10%) alone (AUC = 0.67). We therefore challenge the widely used, strict PSQ cutoff at 10% which might not fully reflect the clinical response to alkylating agents and suggest applying a second method for MGMT testing (e.g. MSP) to confirm PSQ results for patients with LM MGMT levels if therapeutically relevant.

Keywords