ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research (Apr 2024)
Cost-Utility Analysis Comparing Pegcetacoplan to Anti-C5 Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria
Abstract
Sergio Di Matteo,1 Roberto Freilone,2 Giacomo Matteo Bruno,1,3 Rosario Notaro,4 Sabrin Moumene,1 Nicoletta Martone,5 Cristina Teruzzi,5 Antonio Ciccarone,1 Giorgio Lorenzo Colombo1,3 1Center of Research, SAVE Studi - Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Milan, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Oncologia - Direttore SC Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino e componente Tumor Molecular Board (TMB) Regione Piemonte, Torino, Italy; 3Department of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; 4Direttore S.C. Core Research Laboratory in ISPRO, Firenze, Italy; 5Sobi S.r.l., Milano, ItalyCorrespondence: Giorgio Lorenzo Colombo, Email [email protected]: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria is a rare, acquired disease characterized by hemolytic episodes and associated with significant clinical burden. The introduction of C5 inhibitory monoclonal antibodies (C5i) represented a major breakthrough in PNH treatment, effectively reducing intravascular hemolysis (IVH) but showing limited impact on extravascular hemolysis (EVH). In 2021, the C3 inhibitor pegcetacoplan was approved by EMA and recently reimbursed in Italy, which also has the advantages in the reduction of both IVH and EVH, increasing hemoglobin values and simultaneously improving the quality of life and fatigue of patients. A cost-utility analysis was developed to compare pegcetacoplan to C5i (eculizumab and ravulizumab) in the PNH population who remain anemic after treatment with C5i for at least 3 months.Materials and Methods: The analysis employed a Markov model with a 5-year time horizon whereby patients can transition among 3 PNH health states, adopting the perspective of the Italian NHS. Efficacy data were sourced from the PEGASUS study, with drug prices reflecting ex-factory costs. Additionally, costs associated with resource utilization, adverse events, and complications were estimated based on outpatient and hospital care rates, excluding indirect expenses. Utility and disutility values related to transfusions were also considered, with pegcetacoplan allowing for dose escalation.Results: The cumulative cost of treatment per individual patient at 5 years was estimated to be € 1,483,454 for pegcetacoplan, € 1,585,763 for eculizumab, and € 1,574,826 for ravulizumab. Pegcetacoplan demonstrated a superior increase in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to both eculizumab (0.51 increase) and ravulizumab (0.27 increase). Furthermore, pegcetacoplan showed a reduction in complication management costs (€ 22,891 less compared to eculizumab and € 22,611 less compared to ravulizumab) and lower transfusion-related expenses (€ 14,147 less than both C5i treatments).Conclusion: Pegcetacoplan emerged as the dominant strategy in this analysis, being more effective, less expensive and improves quality of life in the analyzed population affected by PNH.Keywords: PNH, pegcetacoplan, eculizumab, ravulizumab, IVH, EVH, cost-utility analysis, pharmacoeconomics
