Frontiers in Immunology (Aug 2021)

Cooperation Between Systemic IgG1 and Mucosal Dimeric IgA2 Monoclonal Anti-HIV Env Antibodies: Passive Immunization Protects Indian Rhesus Macaques Against Mucosal SHIV Challenges

  • Siqi Gong,
  • Siqi Gong,
  • Samir K. Lakhashe,
  • Dinesh Hariraju,
  • Dinesh Hariraju,
  • Hanna Scinto,
  • Hanna Scinto,
  • Antonio Lanzavecchia,
  • Antonio Lanzavecchia,
  • Elisabetta Cameroni,
  • Elisabetta Cameroni,
  • Davide Corti,
  • Davide Corti,
  • Sarah J. Ratcliffe,
  • Kenneth A. Rogers,
  • Kenneth A. Rogers,
  • Peng Xiao,
  • Jane Fontenot,
  • François Villinger,
  • François Villinger,
  • Ruth M. Ruprecht,
  • Ruth M. Ruprecht,
  • Ruth M. Ruprecht,
  • Ruth M. Ruprecht

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.705592
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

Understanding the interplay between systemic and mucosal anti-HIV antibodies can provide important insights to develop new prevention strategies. We used passive immunization via systemic and/or mucosal routes to establish cause-and-effect between well-characterized monoclonal antibodies and protection against intrarectal (i.r.) SHIV challenge. In a pilot study, for which we re-used animals previously exposed to SHIV but completely protected from viremia by different classes of anti-HIV neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), we made a surprise finding: low-dose intravenous (i.v.) HGN194-IgG1, a human neutralizing mAb against the conserved V3-loop crown, was ineffective when given alone but protected 100% of animals when combined with i.r. applied HGN194-dIgA2 that by itself had only protected 17% of the animals. Here we sought to confirm the unexpected synergy between systemically administered IgG1 and mucosally applied dIgA HGN194 forms using six groups of naïve macaques (n=6/group). Animals received i.v. HGN194-IgG1 alone or combined with i.r.-administered dIgA forms; controls remained untreated. HGN194-IgG1 i.v. doses were given 24 hours before – and all i.r. dIgA doses 30 min before – i.r. exposure to a single high-dose of SHIV-1157ipEL-p. All controls became viremic. Among passively immunized animals, the combination of IgG1+dIgA2 again protected 100% of the animals. In contrast, single-agent i.v. IgG1 protected only one of six animals (17%) – consistent with our pilot data. IgG1 combined with dIgA1 or dIgA1+dIgA2 protected 83% (5/6) of the animals. The dIgA1+dIgA2 combination without the systemically administered dose of IgG1 protected 67% (4/6) of the macaques. We conclude that combining suboptimal antibody defenses at systemic and mucosal levels can yield synergy and completely prevent virus acquisition.

Keywords