Critical Care Explorations (Aug 2021)

Defining Potential Therapeutic Targets in Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Single-Center Cohort

  • Nishkantha Arulkumaran, PhD,
  • Timothy Arthur Chandos Snow, FFICM,
  • Adarsh Kulkarni, MD,
  • David Brealey, PhD,
  • Hannah Rickman, MB BChir,
  • Chloe Rees-Spear, MSc,
  • Moira J. Spyer, PhD,
  • Judith Heaney, PhD,
  • Edmund Garr, PhD,
  • Bryan Williams, PhD,
  • Peter Cherepanov, PhD,
  • George Kassiotis, PhD,
  • Michael Lunn, PhD,
  • Catherine Houlihan, PhD,
  • Laura E. McCoy, PhD,
  • Eleni Nastouli, FRCPath,
  • Mervyn Singer, FRCP

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000488
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 8
p. e0488

Abstract

Read online

OBJECTIVES:. Multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain disease severity in coronavirus disease 2019. Therapeutic approaches need to be underpinned by sound biological rationale. We evaluated whether serum levels of a range of proposed coronavirus disease 2019 therapeutic targets discriminated between patients with mild or severe disease. DESIGN:. A search of ClinicalTrials.gov identified coronavirus disease 2019 immunological drug targets. We subsequently conducted a retrospective observational cohort study investigating the association of serum biomarkers within the first 5 days of hospital admission relating to putative therapeutic biomarkers with illness severity and outcome. SETTING:. University College London, a tertiary academic medical center in the United Kingdom. PATIENTS:. Patients admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019. INTERVENTIONS:. None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:. Eighty-six patients were recruited, 44 (51%) with mild disease and 42 (49%) with severe disease. We measured levels of 10 cytokines/signaling proteins related to the most common therapeutic targets (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interferon-α2a, interferon-β, interferon-γ, interleukin-1β, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, interleukin-6, interleukin-7, interleukin-8, tumor necrosis factor-α), immunoglobulin G antibodies directed against either coronavirus disease 2019 spike protein or nucleocapsid protein, and neutralization titers of antibodies. Four-hundred seventy-seven randomized trials, including 168 different therapies against 83 different pathways, were identified. Six of the 10 markers (interleukin-6, interleukin-7, interleukin-8, interferon-α2a, interferon-β, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist) discriminated between patients with mild and severe disease, although most were similar or only modestly raised above that seen in healthy volunteers. A similar proportion of patients with mild or severe disease had detectable spike protein or nucleocapsid protein immunoglobulin G antibodies with equivalent levels between groups. Neutralization titers were higher among patients with severe disease. CONCLUSIONS:. Some therapeutic and prognostic biomarkers may be useful in identifying coronavirus disease 2019 patients who may benefit from specific immunomodulatory therapies, particularly interleukin-6. However, biomarker absolute values often did not discriminate between patients with mild and severe disease or death, implying that these immunomodulatory treatments may be of limited benefit.