PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

Examination of 2D frontal and sagittal markerless motion capture: Implications for markerless applications.

  • Logan Wade,
  • Laurie Needham,
  • Murray Evans,
  • Polly McGuigan,
  • Steffi Colyer,
  • Darren Cosker,
  • James Bilzon

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293917
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 11
p. e0293917

Abstract

Read online

This study examined if occluded joint locations, obtained from 2D markerless motion capture (single camera view), produced 2D joint angles with reduced agreement compared to visible joints, and if 2D frontal plane joint angles were usable for practical applications. Fifteen healthy participants performed over-ground walking whilst recorded by fifteen marker-based cameras and two machine vision cameras (frontal and sagittal plane). Repeated measures Bland-Altman analysis illustrated that markerless standard deviation of bias and limits of agreement for the occluded-side hip and knee joint angles in the sagittal plane were double that of the camera-side (visible) hip and knee. Camera-side sagittal plane knee and hip angles were near or within marker-based error values previously observed. While frontal plane limits of agreement accounted for 35-46% of total range of motion at the hip and knee, Bland-Altman bias and limits of agreement (-4.6-1.6 ± 3.7-4.2˚) were actually similar to previously reported marker-based error values. This was not true for the ankle, where the limits of agreement (± 12˚) were still too high for practical applications. Our results add to previous literature, highlighting shortcomings of current pose estimation algorithms and labelled datasets. As such, this paper finishes by reviewing methods for creating anatomically accurate markerless training data using marker-based motion capture data.