Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (Nov 2022)

Comparing Intramedullary Nails Versus Dynamic Hip Screws in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures on Post-operative Rehabilitation Outcomes:A Systematic Review Protocol

  • Steve Papp MD, MSc, FRCSC,
  • Chantal Backman RN, MHA, PhD,
  • Lauren Konikoff MA,
  • Peter Tanuseputro MD, MHSc, CCFP, FRCPC,
  • Anne Harley CCFP, COE, FCFP,
  • Soha Shah MD,
  • Randa Berdusco MD, MSc, FRCSC,
  • Marie-Cécile Domecq,
  • Stéphane Poitras PT, PhD,
  • Veronique French-Merkley CCFP, COE,
  • Paul E. Beaulé MD, FRCSC

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593221144180
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

Background: Intertrochanteric hip fractures are treated by fixation with either an intramedullary (IM) Nail or Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS). It is unknown whether one surgery type has better post-operative rehabilitative outcomes for the hip fracture population. This systematic review aims to compare post-operative rehabilitation outcomes of intertrochanteric hip fractures treated via IM Nails versus DHS. Methods: We will conduct a systematic review following the Cochrane Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) format. A search strategy will be developed, and the following databases will be searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Two reviewers will perform a two-step screening process and data extraction of included studies. Any disagreement will be resolved with a discussion or a third reviewer. Risk of bias and the quality of the studies will also be assessed. A narrative synthesis will be used for the data analysis. Conclusion: This systematic review will provide evidence for orthopaedic surgeons and rehabilitation clinicians to further improve patient rehabilitation outcomes post-hip fracture surgery.