PLoS ONE (Jan 2013)

Screening for EGFR amplifications with a novel method and their significance for the outcome of glioblastoma patients.

  • Michał Bieńkowski,
  • Sylwester Piaskowski,
  • Ewelina Stoczyńska-Fidelus,
  • Małgorzata Szybka,
  • Mateusz Banaszczyk,
  • Monika Witusik-Perkowska,
  • Emilia Jesień-Lewandowicz,
  • Dariusz J Jaskólski,
  • Anna Radomiak-Załuska,
  • Dorota Jesionek-Kupnicka,
  • Beata Sikorska,
  • Wielisław Papierz,
  • Piotr Rieske,
  • Paweł P Liberski

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065444
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 6
p. e65444

Abstract

Read online

Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive tumour of the central nervous system, characterised by poor prognosis irrespective of the applied treatment. The aim of our study was to analyse whether the molecular markers of glioblastoma (i.e. TP53 and IDH1 mutations, CDKN2A deletion, EGFR amplification, chromosome 7 polysomy and EGFRvIII expression) could be associated with distinct prognosis and/or response to the therapy. Moreover, we describe a method which allows for a reliable, as well as time- and cost-effective, screening for EGFR amplification and chromosome 7 polysomy with quantitative Real-Time PCR at DNA level. In the clinical data, only the patient's age had prognostic significance (continuous: HR = 1.04; p<0.01). At the molecular level, EGFRvIII expression was associated with a better prognosis (HR = 0.37; p = 0.04). Intriguingly, EGFR amplification was associated with a worse outcome in younger patients (HR = 3.75; p<0.01) and in patients treated with radiotherapy (HR = 2.71; p = 0.03). We did not observe any difference between the patients with the amplification treated with radiotherapy and the patients without such a treatment. Next, EGFR amplification was related to a better prognosis in combination with the homozygous CDKN2A deletion (HR = 0.12; p = 0.01), but to a poorer prognosis in combination with chromosome 7 polysomy (HR = 14.88; p = 0.01). Importantly, the results emphasise the necessity to distinguish both mechanisms of the increased EGFR gene copy number (amplification and polysomy). To conclude, although the data presented here require validation in different groups of patients, they strongly advocate the consideration of the patient's tumour molecular characteristics in the selection of the therapy.