Gastroenterology Research and Practice (Jan 2017)

Ileostomy Prolapse in Children with Intestinal Dysmotility

  • Eric A. Sparks,
  • Cristine S. Velazco,
  • Brenna S. Fullerton,
  • Jeremy G. Fisher,
  • Faraz A. Khan,
  • Amber M. Hall,
  • Tom Jaksic,
  • Leonel Rodriguez,
  • Biren P. Modi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7182429
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2017

Abstract

Read online

Background. A relationship between intestinal motility and ileostomy prolapse has been suggested but not demonstrated objectively. Aims. This study evaluated the association between ileostomy prolapse and intestinal dysmotility in children. Methods. IRB-approved retrospective review of 163 patients with ileostomies (1998–2014) at a single institution. Patients were categorized as having clinical dysmotility as a primary diagnosis (n=33), clinically suspected dysmotility based on underlying diagnosis (n=60), or intestinal dysmotility unlikely (n=70) at the time of ileostomy present. Intestinal manometry was categorized as normal (n=13) or abnormal (n=10). Primary outcome was pathologic stoma prolapse. Multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model and log-rank test to compare stoma prolapse rates over time between motility groups were used. Results. Clinical diagnosis of dysmotility (p≤0.001) and manometric findings of dysmotility (p=0.024) were independently associated with stoma prolapse. Clinical dysmotility correlated with manometric findings (κ=0.53). Prolapse occurred in 42% of patients with dysmotility, 34% of patients with suspected dysmotility, and 24% of patients with normal motility. One-year prolapse-free stoma “survival” was 45% for dysmotility, 72% for suspected dysmotility, and 85% for intestinal dysmotility unlikely groups (p=0.006). Conclusions. Children with intestinal dysmotility are at great risk for stoma prolapse. Intestinal manometry could help identify these patients preoperatively.