Zhongguo quanke yixue (Mar 2024)
Evaluation of the Improvement Programme on Ambulatory Training Ability of Community Preceptors in Practice Base of General Practice Based on the CIPP Model
Abstract
Background The training ability of community preceptors is an important factor related to the quality of standardized training for general practitioners (GPs) . In recent years, training programs for community GP preceptors have been conducted in several regions of China, but no research evaluated the implementation of these programs using a comprehensive approach so far. Objective To explore the current situation and obstacles to the implementation of training program of Graded-Supervised Ambulatory Training by the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, and provide theoretical references and strategic support for the development of problem-oriented countermeasures. Methods From October 2021 to January 2022, the implementation status of Graded-Supervised Ambulatory Training program by the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine was systematically evaluated based on CIPP model from four aspects of context, input, process and product, using multiple research methods such as content analysis, expert panels, in-depth interviews, expert rating, and surveys. Results The results of policy document analysis and literature review indicated that community preceptor's training is strongly supported by national health policies, and has been widely implemented in China. The training system developed by the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine basically covers the content and process of community preceptor training programme, while the assessment and incentive system developed by the community lacks of detailed instructions. From May 2021 to January 2022, ten community preceptors completed 57 times of ambulatory training, each attending four to seven times. The average score of ability of ambulatory training increased from (78.6±5.7) in the first round to (87.8±4.5) in the seventh round. The satisfaction rates of "site and equipment of training" "training forms" "content of training" and "effect of training" were over 90% among community preceptors and GP residents, yet the satisfaction rate of "proper incentives" among community preceptors was only 20%. Participants reported that the main barriers at present were "imperfect incentive system" "difficulties in recruiting appropriate patients" and "inapplicable training content" . Conclusion In the initial stage, the Graded-Supervised Ambulatory Training programme has achieved desired results in many aspects, but there is still room for improvement. In the next stage of training, countermeasures should be formulated based on the actual situation of the community practice base to continuously improve the quality of training.
Keywords