Artery Research (Dec 2020)

P.53 Ascending Aorta Diameter and Pulse Wave Velocity are Increased and Local Hemodynamic is Disrupted in Patients with Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury Treated by TEVAR

  • Andrea Guala,
  • Daniel Gil Sala,
  • Aroa Ruiz-Muñoz,
  • Marvin Garcia-Reyes,
  • Lydia Dux-Santoy,
  • Gisela Teixido-Tura,
  • Cristina Tello,
  • Filipa Valente,
  • Angela Lopez-Sainz,
  • Laura Galian,
  • Laura Gutierrez,
  • Kevin Johnson,
  • Oliver Wieben,
  • Ignacio Ferreira,
  • Arturo Evangelista,
  • Sergi Bellmunt-Montoya,
  • Jose Rodriguez-Palomares

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2991/artres.k.201209.063
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 26, no. Supplement 1

Abstract

Read online

Background: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is becoming the preferred treatment option to repair the proximal descending aorta after rupture following blunt traumatic injury. However, hemodynamic and mechanic implications of this intervention are poorly understood. Exploiting the possibilities of 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging, hemodynamics, stiffness and local dilation in the ascending aorta in patients following aortic repair by TEVAR are studied. Methods: Fifteen apparently healthy individuals who underwent TEVAR implantation after traumatic descending aortic injury and 44 healthy volunteers (HV) underwent 4D flow-MRI. Ascending aorta pulse wave velocity was computed [1]. Moreover, at eight planes equally distributed in the ascending aorta systolic flow reversal ratio, i.e. relative amount of backward flow during systole, and in-plane rotational flow, measuring the strength of helical flow, were computed [2,3]. Results: TEVAR patients and HV did not differ in terms of age, sex, BSA and blood pressure (Table). However, compared to HV, TEVAR patients showed reduced in-plane rotational flow in the distal ascending aorta in patients with TEVAR and increased backward systolic flow in the whole ascending aorta (Figure). Patients with TEVAR had a stiffer ascending aorta, with pulse wave velocity higher compared control (7.8 ± 4.2 vs 5.3 ± 1.9, p = 0.004). Finally, aortic root and ascending aorta diameters were larger in TEVAR patients compared to HV (Table). Healthy volunteers TEVAR patients p N 44 15 Age [years] 40 ± 12 43 ± 10 0.392 Sex [% male] 66 80 0.075 Years from intervention [years] N/A 10.3 ± 6.4 N/A Body surface area [m2] 1.87 ± 0.15 1.96 ± 0.23 0.088 Systolic blood pressure [mmHg] 127 ± 19 131 ± 15 0.389 Diastolic blood pressure [mmHg] 70 ± 11 74 ± 9 0.198 Aortic root diameter [mm] 31 ± 4 34 ± 4 0.026 Ascending aorta diameter [mm] 28 ± 4 32 ± 3 0.003 Ascending aorta PWV [m/s] 5.3 ± 1.9 7.8 ± 4.2 0.004 FigureIn-plane rotational flow (IRF, left) and systolic flow reversal ratio (SFRR, right) in healthy volunteers (black) and TEVAR patients (yellow) in the proximal (planes 1 to 4) and distal (planes 5 to 8) ascending aorta. Stars show statistically-significant differences (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The implantation of TEVAR in apparently healthy individuals after traumatic rupture of the proximal descending aorta is associated with altered hemodynamics, higher stiffness and larger aortic diameter in the region proximal to the TEVAR.

Keywords