Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare (Sep 2018)
Sickness certification in Singapore’s public primary healthcare system: A cross-sectional analysis
Abstract
Objectives: Sickness absenteeism has been rising in Singapore with sickness certification commonly performed by primary care physicians. The Primary Care Survey 2014 reported increased primary care demand driven by a rapidly ageing population and the prevalence of chronic disease. This article aims to determine the magnitude of outpatient sickness certification in all the polyclinics in Singapore and identify the demographic characteristics and factors influencing the taking of sick leave by the local multi-ethnic Asian patients. Design: A one-week, cross-sectional survey using computer-assisted interviews with age-stratified, systematically sampled patients was conducted at all 18 polyclinics in 2014. Sick leave data was then extracted from each polyclinic’s administrative system. Data was analysed with logistic regression to determine statistically significant factors. Results: The sickness certification rate was 22.6% during the study period with a weighted average duration of 1.42 days. Sickness certification was most associated with the younger age group (17–20 years; adjusted odd ratio (AOR) = 9.51), an acute condition (AOR = 24.8) and those living in 1–2 room public housing (AOR = 4.72). Among employees, those working in manufacturing industries had the most association with sickness certification while the finance and insurance industry had the least. An acute upper respiratory tract infection was the most frequent diagnosis for those who obtained medical certificates (38.7%). Conclusion: A medical certificate was issued in almost one-quarter of consultations in Singapore polyclinics. Sickness certification was predominated by short-term absence for acute conditions. Characterisation of sickness absenteeism among employees serves as a benchmark for future studies. Mitigation measures were discussed while exclusion of private primary care clinics probably led to an underestimation of the magnitude of sickness certification.