Sex differences in secondary preventive follow-up after coronary heart events

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Some studies point to sex differences in cardiovascular preventive practices. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in achievement of secondary preventive targets and long-term outcome in men and women after a coronary heart event. Methods This study was a subanalysis from a randomized controlled trial of hospital-based versus primary care-based secondary preventive follow-up at Sorlandet Hospital, Norway, 2007–2022 and included both groups. The main outcome was achievement of treatment targets two years after the index event. Event-free survival was calculated based on the composite of mortality, coronary intervention, stroke, or myocardial infarction during follow-up. Participants were followed-up for up to 10 years after the index event through out-patient consultations. Results In total, 337 women and 1203 men were eligible for the study. Due to loss of follow-up during the first two years after the index coronary event 106 (7%) participants were excluded from further analysis (53% withdrawal of consent, 12% death, and 35% other causes) leaving 307 (21%) women and 1127 (79%) men. After two years of follow-up we found no differences between women and men in achievement of blood pressure targets (61% vs. 59%; p = 0.57), LDL-cholesterol goals (64% vs. 69%; p = 0.15), HbA1c-goal in patients with diabetes (49% vs. 45%; p = 0.57), non-smoking (79% vs. 81%; p = 0.34), healthy diets (14% vs. 13%, p = 0.89), physical activity (55% vs. 58%; p = 0.38), use of acetylsalicylic acid (93% vs. 94%; p = 0.39), and use of lipid lowering therapy (92% vs. 94%; p = 0.15). After a median follow-up time of 5.0 [SD 3.2] years there were no differences between women and men regarding composite endpoint (89 [30.0%] vs. 345 [30.6]; p = 0.58), and composite endpoint-free survival did not differ between women and men (hospital-based follow-up HR for women versus men, 0.87, 95% CI 0.62–1.23; p = 0.44 and primary care service HR for women versus men 0.95, 95% CI 0.69–1.31; p = 0.78). Conclusions The study show no sex differences in achievement of secondary preventive targets or composite endpoint after coronary heart events. However, many women and men did not achieve treatment goals, and further improvement in secondary prevention is needed. Trial registration The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00679237).

Keywords

• Sex differences
• Cardiovascular diseases
• Secondary prevention