Medical Devices: Evidence and Research (Jan 2019)

An in vitro acoustic analysis and comparison of popular stethoscopes

  • Weiss D,
  • Erie C,
  • Butera III J,
  • Copt R,
  • Yeaw G,
  • Harpster M,
  • Hughes J,
  • Salem DN

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 12
pp. 41 – 52

Abstract

Read online

Daniel Weiss,1,2 Christine Erie,1,2 Joseph Butera III,2 Ryan Copt,2 Glenn Yeaw,2 Mark Harpster,2 James Hughes,2,3 Deeb N Salem4 1Department of Medicine, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA; 2Bongiovi Medical & Health Technologies, Inc., Port St Lucie, FL, USA; 3Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA; 4Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA Purpose: To compare the performance of various commercially available stethoscopes using standard acoustic engineering criteria, under recording studio conditions.Materials and methods: Eighteen stethoscopes (11 acoustic, 7 electronic) were analyzed using standard acoustic analysis techniques under professional recording studio conditions. An organic phantom that accurately simulated chest cavity acoustics was developed. Test sounds were played via a microphone embedded within it and auscultated at its surface by the stethoscopes. Recordings were made through each stethoscope’s binaurals and/or downloaded (electronic models). Recordings were analyzed using standard studio techniques and software, including assessing ambient noise (AMB) rejection. Frequency ranges were divided into those corresponding to various standard biological sounds (cardiac, respiratory, and gastrointestinal).Results: Loudness and AMB rejection: Overall, electronic stethoscopes, when set to a maximum volume, exhibited greater values of perceived loudness compared to acoustic stethoscopes. Significant variation was seen in AMB rejection capability. Frequency detection: Marked variation was also seen, with some stethoscopes performing better for different ranges (eg, cardiac) vs others (eg, gastrointestinal).Conclusion: The acoustic properties of stethoscopes varied considerably in loudness, AMB rejection, and frequency response. Stethoscope choice should take into account clinical conditions to be auscultated and the noise level of the environment. Keywords: stethoscope, analysis, acoustic, noise, signal

Keywords