PLoS ONE (Jan 2017)

Biomechanics of fencing sport: A scoping review.

  • Tony Lin-Wei Chen,
  • Duo Wai-Chi Wong,
  • Yan Wang,
  • Sicong Ren,
  • Fei Yan,
  • Ming Zhang,
  • Ming Zhang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171578
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 2
p. e0171578

Abstract

Read online

OBJECTIVES:The aim of our scoping review was to identify and summarize current evidence on the biomechanics of fencing to inform athlete development and injury prevention. DESIGN:Scoping review. METHOD:Peer-reviewed research was identified from electronic databases using a structured keyword search. Details regarding experimental design, study group characteristics and measured outcomes were extracted from retrieved studies, summarized and information regrouped under themes for analysis. The methodological quality of the evidence was evaluated. RESULTS:Thirty-seven peer-reviewed studies were retrieved, the majority being observational studies conducted with experienced and elite athletes. The methodological quality of the evidence was "fair" due to the limited scope of research. Male fencers were the prevalent group studied, with the lunge and use of a foil weapon being the principal movement evaluated. Motion capture and pedabarography were the most frequently used data collection techniques. CONCLUSIONS:Elite fencers exhibited sequential coordination of upper and lower limb movements with coherent patterns of muscle activation, compared to novice fencers. These elite features of neuromuscular coordination resulted in higher magnitudes of forward linear velocity of the body center of mass and weapon. Training should focus on explosive power. Sex- and equipment-specific effects could not be evaluated based on available research.