NeuroImage (Jan 2023)
Comparison of beamformer and ICA for dynamic connectivity analysis: A simultaneous MEG-SEEG study
Abstract
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a powerful tool for estimating brain connectivity with both good spatial and temporal resolution. It is particularly helpful in epilepsy to characterize non-invasively the epileptic networks. However, using MEG to map brain networks requires solving a difficult inverse problem that introduces uncertainty in the activity localization and connectivity measures. Our goal here was to compare independent component analysis (ICA) followed by dipole source localization and the linearly constrained minimum-variance beamformer (LCMV-BF) for characterizing regions with interictal epileptic activity and their dynamic connectivity. After a simulation study, we compared ICA and LCMV-BF results with intracerebral EEG (stereotaxic EEG, SEEG) recorded simultaneously in 8 epileptic patients, which provide a unique ‘ground truth’ to which non-invasive results can be confronted. We compared the signal time courses extracted applying ICA and LCMV-BF on MEG data to that of SEEG, both for the actual signals and the dynamic connectivity computed using cross-correlation (evolution of links in time).With our simulations, we illustrated the different effect of the temporal and spatial correlation among sources on the two methods. While ICA was more affected by the temporal correlation but robust against spatial configurations, LCMV-BF showed opposite behavior. Moreover, ICA seems more suited to retrieve the simulated networks.In case of real patient data, good MEG/SEEG correlation and good localization were obtained in 6 out of 8 patients. In 4 of them ICA had the best performance (higher correlation, lower localization distance). In terms of dynamic connectivity, the evolution in time of the cross-correlation links could be retrieved in 5 patients out of 6, however, with more variable results in terms of correlation and distance. In two patients LCMV-BF had better results than ICA. In one patient the two methods showed equally good outcomes, and in the remaining two patients ICA performed best.In conclusion, our results obtained by exploiting simultaneous MEG/SEEG recordings suggest that ICA and LCMV-BF have complementary qualities for retrieving the dynamics of interictal sources and their network interactions.
