Annals, Academy of Medicine, Singapore (Aug 2024)

Quality of life of children and young adults with Down syndrome from caregivers’ perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Yu Yi Chan,
  • Bryan Wei Zhi Wong,
  • Fergus Edward Cheok,
  • Natania Rae Xiangqin Tan,
  • Gwyneth Kong,
  • Zubair Amin,
  • Yvonne Peng Me Ng

DOI
https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2023415
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 53, no. 8
pp. 502 – 513

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Down syndrome (DS) negatively impacts the well-being of affected individuals. This study aimed to summarise the evidence on quality of life (QOL) of children and young adults with DS using quantitative measures from caregivers’ perspective and identify factors that affected their QOL. Method: Database search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL on 24 April 2024. Meta-analysis using random effects model was conducted where feasible. All studies underwent qualitative synthesis. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023413532). Results: Seventeen studies involving 3038 children with DS using various QOL measures were included: Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) (8 studies), KIDSCREEN (4 studies), KidsLife (2 studies), The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research Academic Medical Center Children’s QOL (2 studies) and Personal Outcome Scale (1 study). Meta-analysis on PedsQL studies compared scores between children with DS and typically developing (TD) children. Total scale score was lower in children with DS (mean 70.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 64.31–76.24) compared to TD children (mean 88.17, 95% CI 80.50–95.83). All subdomains of PedsQL were also lower in children with DS. Within the domain of psychosocial health, children with DS had statistically significant lower social functioning (standardised mean difference -1.40, 95% CI -2.27 to -0.53) and school functioning (standardised mean difference -1.09, 95% CI -1.55 to -0.62) scores, but similar emotional functioning scores. Qualitative synthesis revealed poorer subdomain QOL compared to TD children, especially in social functioning and cognitive functioning. QOL worsened during adolescent years. Family variables (parental education and occupation) did not affect parental perception of children’s QOL. Children with DS who had higher intelligent quotient had better QOL. Conclusion: Children with DS have lower caregiver-reported QOL than TD children, especially in social functioning and school functioning subdomains.