Bioengineering (Jul 2025)

A Fully Automated Analysis Pipeline for 4D Flow MRI in the Aorta

  • Ethan M. I. Johnson,
  • Haben Berhane,
  • Elizabeth Weiss,
  • Kelly Jarvis,
  • Aparna Sodhi,
  • Kai Yang,
  • Joshua D. Robinson,
  • Cynthia K. Rigsby,
  • Bradley D. Allen,
  • Michael Markl

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12080807
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 8
p. 807

Abstract

Read online

Four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI has shown promise for the assessment of aortic hemodynamics. However, data analysis traditionally requires manual and time-consuming human input at several stages. This limits reproducibility and affects analysis workflows, such that large-cohort 4D flow studies are lacking. Here, a fully automated artificial intelligence (AI) 4D flow analysis pipeline was developed and evaluated in a cohort of over 350 subjects. The 4D flow MRI analysis pipeline integrated a series of previously developed and validated deep learning networks, which replaced traditionally manual processing tasks (background-phase correction, noise masking, velocity anti-aliasing, aorta 3D segmentation). Hemodynamic parameters (global aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV), peak velocity, flow energetics) were automatically quantified. The pipeline was evaluated in a heterogeneous single-center cohort of 379 subjects (age = 43.5 ± 18.6 years, 118 female) who underwent 4D flow MRI of the thoracic aorta (n = 147 healthy controls, n = 147 patients with a bicuspid aortic valve [BAV], n = 10 with mechanical valve prostheses, n = 75 pediatric patients with hereditary aortic disease). Pipeline performance with BAV and control data was evaluated by comparing to manual analysis performed by two human observers. A fully automated 4D flow pipeline analysis was successfully performed in 365 of 379 patients (96%). Pipeline-based quantification of aortic hemodynamics was closely correlated with manual analysis results (peak velocity: r = 1.00, p r = 0.99, p r = 0.99, p r ≥ 0.99, p p p < 0.005). This study presents a framework for the complete automation of quantitative 4D flow MRI data processing with a failure rate of less than 5%, offering improved measurement reliability in quantitative 4D flow MRI. Future studies are warranted to reduced failure rates and evaluate pipeline performance across multiple centers.

Keywords