The evidence supporting WHO recommendations on the promotion of hand hygiene: a critique

Abstract

Abstract Objective To examine the quality of the evidence relied upon by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in promoting hand hygiene with campaigns such as “Save Lives: Clean Your Hands”. Results The quality of evidence in the studies quoted by the WHO evidence document is highly variable and the methods used limited. In some of the quoted studies, hand hygiene was the primary outcome, rather than the clinically significant outcome of hospital acquired infection (HAI). When HAI was the primary outcome, it was often poorly defined and reported with scant detail. There was wide variation in the hand hygiene compliance achieved in the intervention studies. The majority of studies where the intervention was a campaign to promote hand hygiene used historical control data with variable attempts to account for the fact that HAI rates may have been declining prior to the hand hygiene intervention. The results from trials with a contemporaneous control were conflicting.

Keywords

• Hand hygiene
• Evidence based policy
• Resource allocation