Journal of Digestive Endoscopy (Mar 2023)

Development of a Low-Cost Gastroscope Prototype (GP) for Potential Cost-Effective Gastric Cancer Screening in Prevalent Regions

  • James Xu,
  • Mark E. Benson,
  • Liam M. Granlund,
  • Seth Gehrke,
  • Dylan Stanfield,
  • Jennifer Weiss,
  • Patrick Pfau,
  • Anurag Soni,
  • Ben L. Cox,
  • George Petry,
  • Robert A. Swader,
  • Mark Reichelderfer,
  • Zhanhai Li,
  • Tenzin Atrukstang,
  • Nyah Banik,
  • Kevin W. Eliceiri,
  • Deepak V. Gopal

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1762574
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 01
pp. 022 – 029

Abstract

Read online

Background Screening for gastric cancer is known to be associated with reduced mortality in populations with high prevalence. However, many countries with high prevalence do not screen, with high costs being a significant reason for this. Aims To describe, develop, and assess the potential for a low-cost gastroscope for early cancer screening and patient risk stratification. Methods Our interdisciplinary team used both off-the-shelf and fabricated components to create multiple gastroscope prototypes (GP) in iterative fashion based off clinician feedback. Clinician endoscopists were surveyed using Likert scales regarding device potential, video quality, and handling when testing on a GI training device. Video quality comparison to clinically standard high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) was done using the absolute categorical ratings (ACR) method. Results A candidate cost-effective GP with clinical potential was developed. Although initial versions were scored as inferior via ACR on all views tested when compared to HD-WLE (p < 0.001), participants agreed the concept may be beneficial (M = 4.52/5, SD = 0.72). In testing improved versions, participants agreed the device had the ability to identify discrete (M = 4.62/5, SD = 0.51) and subtle lesions (M = 4/5, SD = 0.7) but most felt video quality, although improved, was still less than HD-WLE. Sufficiency of maneuverability of device to visualize gastric views was rated as equivocal (M = 2.69/5, SD = 1.25). Conclusion The presented low-cost gastroscopic devices have potential for clinical application. With further device development and refinement including the possible addition of technologies in telemedicine and artificial intelligence, we hope the GP can help expand gastric cancer screening for populations in need.

Keywords