Critical Care Explorations (Sep 2023)

Efficacy of Milrinone and Dobutamine in Cardiogenic Shock: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Omar Abdel-Razek, MD, MSc,
  • Pietro Di Santo, MD,
  • Richard G. Jung, MD, PhD,
  • Simon Parlow, MD,
  • Pouya Motazedian, MD,
  • Graeme Prosperi-Porta, MD,
  • Sarah Visintini, MLIS,
  • Jeffrey A. Marbach, MBBS, MSc,
  • F. Daniel Ramirez, MD, MSc,
  • Trevor Simard, MD,
  • Marino Labinaz, MD,
  • Rebecca Mathew, MD,
  • Benjamin Hibbert, MD, PhD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000962
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 9
p. e0962

Abstract

Read online

OBJECTIVES:. Inotropic support is commonly used in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). High-quality data guiding the use of dobutamine or milrinone among this patient population is limited. We compared the efficacy and safety of these two inotropes among patients with low cardiac output states (LCOS) or CS. DATA SOURCES:. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to February 1, 2023, using key terms and index headings related to LCOS or CS and inotropes. DATA EXTRACTION:. Two independent reviewers included studies that compared dobutamine to milrinone on all-cause in-hospital mortality, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, and significant arrhythmias in hospitalized patients. DATA SYNTHESIS:. A total of eleven studies with 21,084 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Only two randomized controlled trials were identified. The primary outcome, all-cause mortality, favored milrinone in observational studies only (odds ratio [OR] 1.19 (95% CI, 1.02–1.39; p = 0.02). In-hospital length of stay (LOS) was reduced with dobutamine in observational studies only (mean difference –1.85 d; 95% CI –3.62 to –0.09; p = 0.04). There was no difference in the prevalence of significant arrhythmias or in ICU LOS. CONCLUSIONS:. Only limited data exists supporting the use of one inotropic agent over another exists. Dobutamine may be associated with a shorter hospital LOS; however, there is also a potential for increased all-cause mortality. Larger randomized studies sufficiently powered to detect a difference in these outcomes are required to confirm these findings.