Forests (Feb 2024)

Response of Individual-Tree Aboveground Biomass to Spatial Effects in <i>Pinus kesiya</i> var. <i>langbianensis</i> Forests by Stand Origin and Tree Size

  • Chunxiao Liu,
  • Yong Wu,
  • Xiaoli Zhang,
  • Hongbin Luo,
  • Zhibo Yu,
  • Zihao Liu,
  • Wenfang Li,
  • Qinling Fan,
  • Guanglong Ou

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020349
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 2
p. 349

Abstract

Read online

To enhance forest carbon sequestration capacity, it is important to optimize forest structure by revealing the spatial effects of the aboveground biomass of individual trees, with particular emphasis on stand origin and tree size. Here, 0.3 ha clear-cut plots of Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis forest were selected in a typical plantation and natural stand. Then, the ordinary least squares model and spatial regression models were used to analyze the different responses between spatial position and individual tree biomass based on the stand origin and diameter at breast height (DBH) of the tree. Our study shows the following: (1) The spatial effect produced a stronger response in the natural stand than in the plantation. The amount of change in the adjusted R-squared (ΔRadj2) of tree component totaled 0.34 and 0.57 for Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis and other trees in the natural stand, compared to only 0.2 and 0.42 in the plantation; (2) Spatial effects had a stronger impact on the accuracy of the fit for the crown (ΔRadj2 = 0.52) compared to the wood and bark (ΔRadj2 = 0.03) in the plantation, and there were no significant differences in the natural stand (ΔRadj2 = 0.42, ΔRadj2 = 0.43); (3) When DBH reached a certain size, the impact of spatial effect for the crown showed a significant change from positive to negative. The sizes of DBH were 19.5 cm, 14 cm and 34.6 cm, 19 cm for branches of Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis and other tree species in the plantation and natural stand, and were 20.3 cm and 31.4 cm for the foliage of Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis. Differences in stand structure led to varied responses in the biomass of tree components to spatial effects.

Keywords