Clinical Ophthalmology (Oct 2024)

Evaluation of the Safety and Tolerability of Lumify Eye Illuminations Cosmetic Products

  • Wesley G,
  • Toyos MM,
  • DiVito MM,
  • Zirwas M

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 18
pp. 3031 – 3042

Abstract

Read online

Gina Wesley,1 Melissa Morrison Toyos,2 Melinda M DiVito,3 Matthew Zirwas4 1Complete Eye Care, Medina, MN, USA; 2Toyos Clinic, Nashville, TN, USA; 3Medical Affairs, Bausch + Lomb, Bridgewater, NJ, USA; 4Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH, USACorrespondence: Gina Wesley, Complete Eye Care, 170 Westfalen Trail, Medina, MN, 55340, USA, Tel +1 763 478 3505, Fax +1 763 478 2727, Email [email protected]: Cosmetic products applied to the periocular area can cause skin sensitivity reactions, and manufacturers routinely test the safety and tolerability of products in development. This research was sponsored by Bausch + Lomb to evaluate three Lumify Eye Illuminations products: a lash and brow serum, a hydra-gel eye cream, and a micellar water eye makeup remover.Methods: A cumulative irritation test (CIT) study and a repeated insult patch test (RIPT) study enrolled adult males or females with no known sensitivities to cosmetic products. Three clinical safety studies enrolled adult females with self-reported characteristics targeted by each product, which was applied in a manner consistent with expected use for 8 or 12 weeks.Results: In CIT (n=34) and RIPT (n=201) studies, faint/minimal erythema reactions were observed in 0% to 2.9% of participants; there were no moderate or severe reactions. No safety signals were observed in participants who completed clinical safety studies for lash and brow serum (n=66 enrolled, n=55 completed [83%]), eye cream (n=61 enrolled, n=52 completed [85%]), or eye makeup remover (n=80 enrolled, n=68 completed [85%]). No clinically relevant changes in visual acuity or ophthalmologic slit-lamp examination findings were noted. No participants reported ocular sensations of burning/stinging, foreign-body sensation, or soreness. At the final clinical safety study assessment, mild cutaneous erythema (as graded by the investigator) was reported for one participant (eye cream study); no other prespecified signs of cutaneous irritation (eg, edema, dryness) were observed. A treatment-related adverse event that led to study discontinuation was experienced by one participant in the eye makeup remover study (bilateral periorbital swelling).Conclusion: Findings from rigorously conducted irritation testing and clinical safety studies indicated that these products were safe and well tolerated. Increased availability of data regarding ocular and cutaneous safety of cosmetic products can inform consumer decision-making and eye care provider recommendations.Keywords: cutaneous, cosmetics, irritation, periocular

Keywords