Tomography (Jul 2022)

The Diagnostic Performance of Multi-Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) in Depiction of Acute Spondylodiscitis in an Emergency Department

  • Alberto Negro,
  • Francesco Somma,
  • Mario Tortora,
  • Marina Lugarà,
  • Stefania Tamburrini,
  • Maria Gabriella Coppola,
  • Valeria Piscitelli,
  • Fabrizio Fasano,
  • Carmine Sicignano,
  • Ottavia Vargas,
  • Gianvito Pace,
  • Mariarosaria Giardiello,
  • Michele Iannuzzi,
  • Gabriella Toro,
  • Fiore De Simone,
  • Marco Catalano,
  • Roberto Carbone,
  • Concetta Rocco,
  • Pietro Paolo Saturnino,
  • Luigi Della Gatta,
  • Alessandro Villa,
  • Fabio Tortora,
  • Laura Gemini,
  • Ferdinando Caranci,
  • Vincenzo D’Agostino

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8040160
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 4
pp. 1895 – 1904

Abstract

Read online

Background: The diagnosis of acute spondylodiscitis can be very difficult because clinical onset symptoms are highly variable. The reference examination is MRI, but very often the first diagnostic investigation performed is CT, given its high availability in the acute setting. CT allows rapid evaluation of other alternative diagnoses (e.g., fractures), but scarce literature is available to evaluate the accuracy of CT, and in particular of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT), in the diagnosis of suspected spondylodiscitis. The aim of our study was to establish MDCT accuracy and how this diagnostic method could help doctors in the depiction of acute spondylodiscitis in an emergency situation by comparing the diagnostic performance of MDCT with MRI, which is the gold standard. Methods: We searched our radiological archive for all MRI examinations of patients who had been studied for a suspicion of acute spondylodiscitis in the period between January 2017 and January 2021 (n = 162). We included only patients who had undergone MDCT examination prior to MRI examination (n = 25). The overall diagnostic value of MDCT was estimated, using MRI as the gold standard. In particular, the aim of our study was to clarify the effectiveness of CT in radiological cases that require immediate intervention (stage of complications). Therefore, the radiologist, faced with a negative CT finding, can suggest an elective (not urgent) MRI with relative serenity and without therapeutic delays. Results: MDCT allowed identification of the presence of acute spondylodiscitis in 13 of 25 patients. Specificity and positive predictive value were 100% for MDCT, while sensitivity and negative predictive value were 68% and 50%, respectively, achieving an overall accuracy of 76%. In addition, MDCT allowed the identification of paravertebral abscesses (92%), fairly pathognomonic lesions of spondylodiscitis pathology. Conclusions: The MDCT allows identification of the presence of acute spondylodiscitis in the Emergency Department (ED) with a satisfactory accuracy. In the case of a positive CT examination, this allows therapy to be started immediately and reduces complications. However, we suggest performing an elective MRI examination in negative cases in which pathological findings are hard to diagnose with CT alone.

Keywords