JIMD Reports (Jul 2022)

Natural history of arginase 1 deficiency and the unmet needs of patients: A systematic review of case reports

  • Aseel Bin Sawad,
  • Arti Pothukuchy,
  • Mark Badeaux,
  • Victoria Hodson,
  • Gillian Bubb,
  • Kristina Lindsley,
  • Jennifer Uyei,
  • George A. Diaz

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmd2.12283
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 63, no. 4
pp. 330 – 340

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Arginase 1 deficiency (ARG1‐D) is a rare, progressive and debilitating urea cycle disorder characterized by clinical manifestations including spasticity, seizures, developmental delay, and intellectual disability. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and summarize the natural history of ARG1‐D and the unmet needs of patients. Methods A comprehensive search of published case reports was undertaken to identify patients with ARG1‐D regardless of interventions, comparisons, or outcomes. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other evidence‐based medicine literature databases were searched on 20 April 2020. Quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist. (PROSPERO registration: CRD42020212142.) Results One hundred and fifty seven ARG1‐D patients were included from 111 publications (good overall quality based on JBI's Checklist); 84 (53.5%) were males. Motor deficits (including spasticity), intellectual disability, and seizures were reported in >50% of the cases. Mean age (SD) at diagnosis was 6.4 years and the laboratory findings most commonly reported to support diagnosis included elevated plasma arginine (81.5%), mutation in ARG1 gene through genetic testing (60%), and absence/reduction of red blood cell arginase activity (51%). Reported management approaches mainly included dietary protein restriction (68%), nitrogen scavengers (45%), and essential amino acid supplements (21%). Author‐reported clinical improvement was documented for 26% of patients, 15% deteriorated, and 19% had limited or no change; notably, no indication of clinical outcome was reported for 40% cases. Conclusion This review illustrates a significant burden of disease and highlights a considerable unmet need for clinically effective treatment options for patients with ARG1‐D.

Keywords