Robotic or laparoscopic approach for hysterectomy: comparison of operative outcomes and cost

Abstract

Purpose: The present study aimed to compare surgical outcomes and cost analysis of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) hysterectomy procedures. Materials and Methods: The patients who underwent total robotic hysterectomy or total conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy due to benign gynecological disorders such as uterine fibroid, abnormal uterine bleeding, endometrial hyperplasia, adenomyosis, persistent ovarian cysts, chronic pelvic pain were retrospectively evaluated. Results: A total of 80 women underwent RAS or CLS hysterectomy during the study period. The mean total operative time was 187 ±10 min. in RAS and 133 ±24 min. in CLS groups, respectively. The mean total cost of the RAS hysterectomy group was 17.710 TL, and CLS hysterectomy group was 7000 TL. Conclusion: Both CLS and RAS hysterectomies for benign gynecological indications are safe surgical procedures with negligible complication rates. RAS is a more expensive procedure compared to CLS.

Keywords

• hysterectomy
• gynecology
• robot-enhanced surgery
• histerektomi
• jinekoloji
• robot destekli cerrahi