Интеллект. Инновации. Инвестиции (Dec 2023)

Criteria of scientificity and their evolution as a problem of philosophy of science

  • N. V. Bryanik

DOI
https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2023-6-126
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6
pp. 126 – 133

Abstract

Read online

The relevance of research into the criteria of scientificity becomes more acute with each new stage in the development of science, and such a situation has accompanied science since the time when it acquired the status of the epicenter of New European culture. The aim of science at obtaining reliable knowledge, possessing universality and general significance, applicable to all spheres of human life (as emphasized by V.I. Vernadsky), becomes attractive for all those who would like to speak on behalf of science, without having any grounds for it. The aim of the article is to show the complexity of the process of formation of criteria of scientificity at the main stages of development of European science, as well as the search for a general scientific criterion of scientificity within the philosophy of science. Taking into account the dominant tendency of modern philosophy of science – turning to the history of science, the author conducts a comparative analysis of the criteria of scientificity developed in Antiquity, the Middle Ages and the Modern Age. This method of research is supplemented by an appeal to internal and external factors affecting both the formation of criteria of scientificity and their substitution by pseudoscientific ideas and constructions. As a result of the conducted research, we come to the following conclusions possessing novelty. Firstly, the criterion of scientificity has a historical and systemic character, so it would be more accurate to speak about the criteria of scientificity. Secondly, the only feature that unites the historical forms of criteria of scientificity is the peculiarities of scientific attitude to the world. And, thirdly, the possibility of violating the criteria of scientificity is inherent in the relative nature of scientific knowledge, but this possibility becomes a reality under certain socio-political circumstances. The practical significance of the conducted research is seen in the fact that it creates a methodological basis for assessing the scientificity/ pseudo-scientificity of hypothetical constructions in cases of controversial situations for the scientific community.

Keywords