Scientific Reports (May 2023)

General anesthesia with propofol during oocyte retrieval and in vitro fertilization outcomes: retrospective cohort study

  • Einat Haikin Herzberger,
  • Omri Levy,
  • Bei Sun,
  • Netanella Miller,
  • Roni Rahav,
  • Elad Dana,
  • Shaul Raviv,
  • Anat Hershko-Klement,
  • Amir Wiser

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35224-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 1
pp. 1 – 6

Abstract

Read online

Abstract General anesthesia is frequently administered during oocyte retrieval. Its effects on the outcomes of IVF cycles are uncertain. This study investigated whether administration of general anesthesia (specifically propofol) during oocyte retrieval affects IVF outcomes. A total of 245 women undergoing IVF cycles were included in this retrospective cohort study. IVF outcomes of 129 women who underwent oocyte retrieval under propofol anesthesia and 116 without anesthesia were compared. Data were adjusted for age, BMI, estradiol on triggering day and total gonadotropin dose. The primary outcomes were fertilization, pregnancy and live birth rates. A secondary outcome was the efficiency of follicle retrieval associated with the use of anesthesia. Fertilization rate was lower in retrievals under anesthesia compared to without (53.4% ± 34.8 vs. 63.7% ± 33.6, respectively; p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the ratio of expected to retrieved oocytes between retrievals with and without anesthesia (0.8 ± 0.4 vs. 0.8 ± 0.8, respectively, p = 0.96). The differences in pregnancy and live birth rates between the groups were not statistically significant. General anesthesia administered during oocyte retrieval may have adverse effects on the fertilization potential of oocytes. This impact on the developmental potential of oocytes may lead to negative IVF outcomes and should be investigated further.