A comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes using the Objective Grading System (OGS) and the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index

Chalabi Orfan; Preston Charles Brian; Al-Jewair Thikriat S.; Tabbaa Sawsan

doi:10.21307/aoj-2020-150

Australasian Orthodontic Journal (Jan 2015)

A comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes using the Objective Grading System (OGS) and the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index

Chalabi Orfan,
Preston Charles Brian,
Al-Jewair Thikriat S.,
Tabbaa Sawsan

Affiliations

Chalabi Orfan: *Private practice, Orange County, California, New York, USA
Preston Charles Brian: †Department of Orthodontics, State University of New York, New York, USA
Al-Jewair Thikriat S.: †Department of Orthodontics, State University of New York, New York, USA
Tabbaa Sawsan: †Department of Orthodontics, State University of New York, New York, USA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2020-150
Journal volume & issue: Vol. 31, no. 2
pp. 157 – 164

Abstract

Read online

The use of objective criteria is essential to uniformly quantify and measure the severity of malocclusions and the efficacy of different treatment modalities. The Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index and, more recently, the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (OGS) were developed to fulfill this need.

Published in Australasian Orthodontic Journal

ISSN: 2207-7480 (Online)
Publisher: Sciendo
Country of publisher: Poland
LCC subjects: Medicine: Dentistry
Website: https://sciendo.com/it/journal/AOJ

About the journal