Implementation Science Communications (Jul 2023)

Implementing practice facilitation in research: how facilitators spend their time guiding practices to improve blood pressure control

  • Kent F. Sutton,
  • Erica L. Richman,
  • Jennifer R. Rees,
  • Liza L. Pugh-Nicholson,
  • Macie M. Craft,
  • Shannon H. Peaden,
  • Orysya Soroka,
  • Monique Mackey,
  • Doyle M. Cummings,
  • Andrea L. Cherrington,
  • Monika M. Safford,
  • Jacqueline R. Halladay,
  • Southeastern Collaboration to Improve Blood Pressure Writing Group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00470-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Practice facilitators (PFs) coach practices through quality improvement (QI) initiatives aimed at enhancing patient outcomes and operational efficiencies. Practice facilitation is a dynamic intervention that, by design, is tailored to practices’ unique needs and contexts. Little research has explored the amount of time PFs spend with practices on QI activities. This short report expands on previously published work that detailed a 12-month practice facilitation intervention as part of the Southeastern Collaboration to Improve Blood Pressure Control (SEC) trial, which focused on improving hypertension control among people living in rural settings in the southeastern USA. This report analyzes data on the time PFs spent to guide 32 primary care practices in implementing QI activities to support enhanced outcomes in patients with high blood pressure. Methods The SEC trial employed four certified PFs across all practice sites, who documented time spent: (1) driving to support practices; (2) working on-site with staff and clinicians; and (3) communicating remotely (phone, email, or video conference) with practice members. We analyzed the data using descriptive statistics to help understand time devoted to individual and aggregated tasks. Additionally, we explored correlations between practice characteristics and time spent with PFs. Results In aggregate, the PFs completed 416 visits to practices and spent an average of 130 (SD 65) min per visit driving to and from practices. The average time spent on-site per visit with practices was 87 (SD 37) min, while an average of 17 (SD 12) min was spent on individual remote communications. During the 12-month intervention, 1131 remote communications were conducted with practices. PFs spent most of their time with clinical staff members (n = 886 instances) or with practice managers alone (n = 670 instances) while relatively few on-site visits were conducted with primary care providers alone (n = 15). In 19 practices, no communications were solely with providers. No significant correlations were found between time spent on PF activities and a practices’ percent of Medicaid and uninsured patients, staff-provider ratio, or federally qualified health center (FQHC) status. Conclusions PFs working with practices serving rural patients with hypertension devote substantial time to driving, highlighting the importance of optimizing a balance between time spent on-site vs. communicating remotely. Most time spent was with clinical staff, not primary care providers. These findings may be useful to researchers and business leaders who design, test, and implement efficient facilitation services. Trial registration NIH ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02866669 . Registered on 15 August 2016. NHLBI AWARD number: PCS-1UH3HL130691.

Keywords