Impact of the antimicrobial stewardship program on hospital-acquired candidemia

Abstract

Abstract Antibiotic stewardship programs reduce antibiotic use without negative clinical outcomes. However, epidemiological data describing the relationship between implementing antimicrobial stewardship and candidemia incidence are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of antibiotic stewardship on the incidence of hospital acquired candidemia. We conducted a retrospective study from April 2017 to September 2020. We reviewed patients that were treated with three broad-spectrum antipseudomonal agents: carbapenem, tazobactam/piperacillin, and cefepime. Monthly aggregated hospital antimicrobial consumption was measured as days of therapy (DOTs) per 1000 patient-days, and the monthly incidence of hospital acquired candidemia was recorded. The median monthly carbapenem-DOTs during pre-intervention and intervention were 28.4 and 10.0, respectively. Time-series analysis showed significant level changes after intervention: − 10.0 DOTs (p = 0.02). There was a downward trend in the monthly carbapenem-DOTs after intervention. The median hospital-acquired candidemia incidence was 0.17 and 0.08 per 1000 patient-days during pre-intervention and intervention periods, respectively. Time-series analysis showed a significant level change after intervention (− 0.16 per 1000 patient-days; p = 0.048). The trend in the incidence of hospital-acquired candidemia did not significantly change between pre-intervention and intervention. Decreased broad-spectrum antibiotic use (particularly carbapenem) by our antimicrobial stewardship term may reduce hospital-acquired candidemia incidences.