European Journal of General Practice (Dec 2023)

Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for acute appendicitis in children in primary care

  • Guus Blok,
  • Huib Burger,
  • Johan van der Lei,
  • Marjolein Berger,
  • Gea Holtman

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2023.2233053
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 29, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

AbstractBackground Recognising acute appendicitis in children presenting with acute abdominal pain in primary care is challenging. General practitioners (GPs) may benefit from a clinical prediction rule.Objectives To develop and validate a clinical prediction rule for acute appendicitis in children presenting with acute abdominal pain in primary care.Methods In a historical cohort study data was retrieved from GP electronic health records included in the Integrated Primary Care Information database. We assigned children aged 4–18 years presenting with acute abdominal pain (≤ 7 days) to development (2010–2012) and validation (2013–2016) cohorts, using acute appendicitis within six weeks as the outcome. Multiple logistic regression was used to develop a prediction model based on predictors with > 50% data availability derived from existing rules for secondary care. We performed internal and external temporal validation and derived a point score to stratify risk of appendicitis into three groups, i.e. low-risk, medium-risk and high-risk.Results The development and validation cohorts included 2,041 and 3,650 children, of whom 95 (4.6%) and 195 (5.3%) had acute appendicitis. The model included male sex, pain duration ( 48 h), nausea/vomiting, elevated temperature (≥ 37.3 °C), abnormal bowel sounds, right lower quadrant tenderness, and peritoneal irritation. Internal and temporal validation showed good discrimination (C-statistics: 0.93 and 0.90, respectively) and excellent calibration. In the three groups, the risks of acute appendicitis were 0.5%, 7.5%, and 41%,Conclusion Combined with further testing in the medium-risk group, the prediction rule could improve clinical decision making and outcomes.

Keywords