Horticulturae (Jul 2022)

Compost Composition and Application Rate Have a Greater Impact on Spinach Yield and Soil Fertility Benefits Than Feedstock Origin

  • Alicia J. Kelley,
  • David N. Campbell,
  • Ann C. Wilkie,
  • Gabriel Maltais-Landry

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8080688
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 8
p. 688

Abstract

Read online

Rapid urbanization results in the accumulation of food wastes that can be composted and diverted from landfills. Previous lab incubations demonstrated that food-based composts can increase soil N relative to manure-based composts, but these benefits were not tested within a crop system. We assessed soil fertility and yield of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) grown in two different soils in a greenhouse, comparing two food- and two manure-based composts added at the recommended N rate (101 kg N ha−1). We quantified soil N mineralization and resin-extractable phosphorus, spinach biomass (root and shoot), and crop nutrient concentrations and accumulation. Nitrogen mineralization generally peaked four weeks after application, and one food-based compost (but no manure-based composts) increased soil phosphorus at harvest compared to an unamended control. One manure-based compost and one food-based compost produced a higher yield and greater nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium accumulation than the unamended control, whereas only the food-based compost increased spinach phosphorus and potassium concentrations. There was a positive relationship between yield and compost inputs of potassium and plant-available nitrogen (especially nitrate), suggesting that potassium inputs may also explain differences observed among composts. Our results suggest that food-based compost provides more nutrients than composts made from cow manure fiber.

Keywords