Brain and Spine (Jan 2024)

Consensus-based recommendations for diagnosis and surgical management of cranioplasty and post-traumatic hydrocephalus from a European panel

  • Corrado Iaccarino,
  • Salvatore Chibbaro,
  • Thomas Sauvigny,
  • Ivan Timofeev,
  • Ismail Zaed,
  • Silvio Franchetti,
  • Harry Mee,
  • Antonio Belli,
  • Andras Buki,
  • Pasquale De Bonis,
  • Andreas K. Demetriades,
  • Bart Depreitere,
  • Kostantinos Fountas,
  • Mario Ganau,
  • Antonino Germanò,
  • Peter Hutchinson,
  • Angelos Kolias,
  • Dirk Lindner,
  • Laura Lippa,
  • Niklas Marklund,
  • Catherine McMahon,
  • Dorothee Mielke,
  • Davide Nasi,
  • Wilco Peul,
  • Maria Antonia Poca,
  • Angelo Pompucci,
  • Jussi P. Posti,
  • Nicoleta-Larisa Serban,
  • Bruno Splavski,
  • Ioan Stefan Florian,
  • Anastasia Tasiou,
  • Gianluigi Zona,
  • Franco Servadei

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4
p. 102761

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Planning cranioplasty (CPL) in patients with suspected or proven post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) poses a significant management challenge due to a lack of clear guidance. Research question: This project aims to create a European document to improve adherence and adapt to local protocols based on available resources and national health systems. Methods: After a thorough non-systematic review, a steering committee (SC) formed a European expert panel (EP) for a two-round questionnaire using the Delphi method. The questionnaire employed a 9-point Likert scale to assess the appropriateness of statements inherent to two sections: ''Diagnostic criteria for PTH'' and ''Surgical strategies for PTH and cranial reconstruction.'' Results: The panel reached a consensus on 29 statements. In the ''Diagnostic criteria for PTH'' section, five statements were deemed ''appropriate'' (consensus 74.2−90.3 %), two were labeled ''inappropriate,'' and seven were marked as ''uncertain.''In the ''Surgical strategies for PTH and cranial reconstruction'' section, four statements were considered ''appropriate'' (consensus 74.2−90.4 %), six were ''inappropriate,'' and five were ''uncertain.'' Discussion and conclusion: Planning a cranioplasty alongside hydrocephalus remains a significant challenge in neurosurgery. Our consensus conference suggests that, in patients with cranial decompression and suspected hydrocephalus, the most suitable diagnostic approach involves a combination of evolving clinical conditions and neuroradiological imaging. The recommended management sequence prioritizes cranial reconstruction, with the option of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt when needed, preferably with a programmable valve. We strongly recommend to adopt local protocols based on expert consensus, such as this, to guide patient care.

Keywords