Applied Sciences (Aug 2024)

A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Manual Methods for Identifying Anatomical Landmarks through Cephalometry and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Yoonji Lee,
  • Jeong-Hye Pyeon,
  • Sung-Hoon Han,
  • Na Jin Kim,
  • Won-Jong Park,
  • Jun-Beom Park

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14167342
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 16
p. 7342

Abstract

Read online

Background: Researchers have noted that the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) heralds a promising era, with potential to significantly enhance diagnostic and predictive abilities in clinical settings. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the discrepancies in identifying anatomical landmarks between AI and manual approaches. Methods: A comprehensive search strategy was employed, incorporating controlled vocabulary (MeSH) and free-text terms. This search was conducted by two reviewers to identify published systematic reviews. Three major electronic databases, namely, Medline via PubMed, the Cochrane database, and Embase, were searched up to May 2024. Results: Initially, 369 articles were identified. After conducting a comprehensive search and applying strict inclusion criteria, a total of ten studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The results showed that the average difference in detecting anatomical landmarks between artificial intelligence and manual approaches was 0.35, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from −0.09 to 0.78. Additionally, the overall effect between the two groups was found to be insignificant. Upon further analysis of the subgroup of cephalometric radiographs, it was determined that there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of detecting anatomical landmarks. Similarly, the subgroup of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) revealed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusions: In summary, the study concluded that the use of artificial intelligence is just as effective as the manual approach when it comes to detecting anatomical landmarks, both in general and in specific contexts such as cephalometric radiographs and CBCT evaluations.

Keywords