Tillage Systems Modify the Soil Properties and Cassava Physiology During Drought
Jimmy A. Ocaña-Reyes,
Richard Paredes-Espinosa,
Astrid Quispe-Tomas,
Henry Díaz-Chuquizuta,
Zoila L. Ore-Aquino,
Alex I. Agurto-Piñarreta,
W. Michel Paz Monge,
Roiser H. Lobato-Galvez,
José G. Ruiz Reyes,
José W. Zavala-Solórzano,
Hugo Alfredo Huamani Yupanqui,
Giannfranco Egoávil-Jump,
Ceila P. Lao Olivares
Affiliations
Jimmy A. Ocaña-Reyes
Estación Experimental Agraria Pucallpa, Dirección de Desarrollo Tecnológico Agrario, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), Pucallpa 25000, Ucayali, Peru
Richard Paredes-Espinosa
Estación Experimental Agraria Pucallpa, Dirección de Desarrollo Tecnológico Agrario, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), Pucallpa 25000, Ucayali, Peru
Astrid Quispe-Tomas
Estación Experimental Agraria Pucallpa, Dirección de Desarrollo Tecnológico Agrario, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), Pucallpa 25000, Ucayali, Peru
Henry Díaz-Chuquizuta
Estación Experimental Agraria El Porvenir, Dirección Seguimiento y Monitoreo de Estaciones Experimentales, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), Carretera Fernando Belaúnde Terry, Km 14.5, Juan Guerra 22200, San Martín, Peru
Zoila L. Ore-Aquino
Dirección de Desarrollo Tecnológico Agrario, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), La Molina 15024, Lima, Peru
Alex I. Agurto-Piñarreta
Dirección de Desarrollo Tecnológico Agrario, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), La Molina 15024, Lima, Peru
W. Michel Paz Monge
Dirección de Desarrollo Tecnológico Agrario, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), La Molina 15024, Lima, Peru
Roiser H. Lobato-Galvez
Dirección de Desarrollo Tecnológico Agrario, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), La Molina 15024, Lima, Peru
José G. Ruiz Reyes
Dirección de Desarrollo Tecnológico Agrario, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), La Molina 15024, Lima, Peru
José W. Zavala-Solórzano
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional Agraria de la Selva (UNAS), Tingo María 10131, Huánuco, Peru
Hugo Alfredo Huamani Yupanqui
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional Agraria de la Selva (UNAS), Tingo María 10131, Huánuco, Peru
Giannfranco Egoávil-Jump
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional Agraria de la Selva (UNAS), Tingo María 10131, Huánuco, Peru
Ceila P. Lao Olivares
Facultad de Ingeniería Ambiental, Universidad Peruana Unión (UPeU), Tarapoto 22000, San Martín, Peru
Soils are highly sensitive to the type of tillage practices used, as these practices influence soil properties and affect crops, the environment, and society. However, research on cassava production under different tillage systems during drought conditions in the Peruvian Amazon has not been reported. The objective of this study was to compare soil properties, cassava physiology, and yield under conservation agriculture (CA) and traditional agriculture (TA) practices, with and without mulch, in a water-scarce environment. Soil moisture, earthworm population (Ew), stomatal conductance, leaf area index, and commercial yield under CA were 5.26% (~105.2 m3 ha−1), 83%, 1.2 times, 1.14 times, and 7.3 t ha−1, respectively, higher than under TA. Hydraulic conductivity (Ks) in TA was 2.1 times higher than that in CA. However, Ks, bulk density, and Ew over time showed a gradual recovery under CA. The mulch factor only affected Ew, which was higher without mulch than with mulch. The results indicate that CA practices were superior to TA practices, improving soil properties, cassava physiology, and yield, and, therefore, offer significant benefits in resource conservation and higher production and profitability in a drought-prone environment.