International Journal of Mental Health Systems (Sep 2008)

Pathway to psychiatric care in Japan: A multicenter observational study

  • Kikuchi Toshiaki,
  • Sato Ryoko,
  • Nakagawa Atsuo,
  • Okugawa Gaku,
  • Tateno Masaru,
  • Otsuka Kotaro,
  • Masamune-Koizumi Yayoi,
  • Hashimoto Naoki,
  • Fujisawa Daisuke,
  • Tonai Eita,
  • Yoshida Kosuke,
  • Mori Takatoshi,
  • Takahashi Hidehiko,
  • Sato Soichiro,
  • Igimi Hiroyasu,
  • Waseda Yoshibumi,
  • Ueno Takefumi,
  • Morokuma Ippei,
  • Takahashi Katsuyoshi,
  • Sartorius Norman

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-4458-2-14
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 1
p. 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background This study examines pathways to psychiatric care in Japan using the same method as the collaborative study carried out in 1991 under the auspices of the World Health Organization. Methods Thirteen psychiatric facilities in Japan were involved. Of the 228 patients who contacted psychiatric facilities with any psychiatric illness, eighty four visiting psychiatric facilities for the first time were enrolled. Pathways to psychiatric care, delays from the onset of illness to treatment prior to reaching psychiatrists were surveyed. Results Thirty three patients (39.4%) directly accessed mental health professionals, 32 patients (38.1%) reached them via general hospital, and 13 patients (15.5%) via private practitioners. The patients who consulted mental health professionals as their first carers took a longer time before consulting psychiatrists than the patients who consulted non-mental health professionals as their first carers. The patients who presented somatic symptoms as their main problem experienced longer delay from the onset of illness to psychiatric care than the patients who complained about depressive or anxiety symptoms. Prior to the visit to mental health professionals, patients were rarely informed about their diagnosis and did not receive appropriate treatments from their physicians. Private practitioners were more likely to prescribe psychotropics than physicians in general hospitals, but were less likely to inform their patients of their diagnosis. Conclusion This first pathway to psychiatric care study in Japan demonstrated that referral pathway in Japan heavily relies on medical resources. The study indicates possible fields and gives indications, underlining the importance of improving skills and knowledge that will facilitate the recognition of psychiatric disorders presenting with somatic and depressive symptoms in the general health care system and by private practitioners.