Assortative mating and within-spouse pair comparisons

Abstract

Spousal comparisons have been proposed as a design that can both reduce confounding and estimate effects of the shared adulthood environment. However, assortative mating, the process by which individuals select phenotypically (dis)similar mates, could distort associations when comparing spouses. We evaluated the use of spousal comparisons, as in the within-spouse pair (WSP) model, for aetiological research such as genetic association studies. We demonstrated that the WSP model can reduce confounding but may be susceptible to collider bias arising from conditioning on assorted spouse pairs. Analyses using UK Biobank spouse pairs found that WSP genetic association estimates were smaller than estimates from random pairs for height, educational attainment, and BMI variants. Within-sibling pair estimates, robust to demographic and parental effects, were also smaller than random pair estimates for height and educational attainment, but not for BMI. WSP models, like other within-family models, may reduce confounding from demographic factors in genetic association estimates, and so could be useful for triangulating evidence across study designs to assess the robustness of findings. However, WSP estimates should be interpreted with caution due to potential collider bias. Author summary There is growing evidence that genome-wide association studies capture associations relating to environmental factors, such as indirect effects from parental genotypes. Within-family models such as sibling comparisons can be used to disentangles these different sources of association but are limited by the paucity of sibling data in large biobanks. Within-spouse pair models are a potentially tractable model because spouses share environmental factors in adulthood and may also share early-life environmental factors. Here, we evaluated the application of within-spouse models in genetic association studies, specifically considering assortative mating, a phenomenon whereby individuals may select a phenotypically similar partner. We found that within-spouse pair models can detect genuine confounding in genetic association estimates but are potentially susceptible to collider bias induced by comparing assorted pairs. Within-spouse pair estimates could be useful when combining evidence from different study designs.