Concurrence of Inactivation Enzyme-Encoding Genes <i>tet</i>(X), <i>bla</i>_EBR, and <i>estT</i> in <i>Empedobacter</i> Species from Chickens and Surrounding Environments

Abstract

The emergence of inactivation enzyme-encoding genes tet(X), blaEBR, and estT challenges the effectiveness of tetracyclines, β-lactams, and macrolides. This study aims to explore the concurrence and polymorphism of their variants in Empedobacter sp. strains from food-producing animals and surrounding environments. A total of eight tet(X) variants, seven blaEBR variants, and seven estT variants were detected in tet(X)-positive Empedobacter sp. strains (6.7%) from chickens, sewage, and soil, including 31 Empedobacter stercoris and 6 novel species of Taxon 1. All of them were resistant to tigecycline, tetracycline, colistin, and ciprofloxacin, and 16.2% were resistant to meropenem, florfenicol, and cefotaxime. The MIC90 of tylosin, tilmicosin, and tildipirosin was 128 mg/L, 16 mg/L, and 8 mg/L, respectively. Cloning expression confirmed that tet(X6) and the novel variants tet(X23), tet(X24), tet(X25), tet(X26), and tet(X26.2) conferred high-level tigecycline resistance, while all of the others exhibited relatively low-level activities or were inactivated. The bacterial relationship was diverse, but the genetic environments of tet(X) and blaEBR were more conserved than estT. An ISCR2-mediated tet(X6) transposition structure, homologous to those of Acinetobacter sp., Proteus sp., and Providencia sp., was also identified in Taxon 1. Therefore, the tet(X)-positive Empedobacter sp. strains may be ignored and pose a serious threat to food safety and public health.

Keywords

• <i>Empedobacter</i> sp.
• chicken
• tetracyclines
• <i>tet</i>(X)
• β-lactams
• <i>bla</i>_EBR