Is Intravenous and Oral Topotecan in Small-Cell Lung Cancer Truly Equal? A Case Report

Abstract

Introduction: Treatment with topotecan is standard-of-care therapy for relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Both oral and intravenous administrations of topotecan have been extensively researched and are found to be equally effective with less adverse events in the oral group. Case Presentation: We report a case of a patient with SCLC, who had previously received oral topotecan, with radiological stable disease with no changes in tumor or metastasis diameter size after two administrations. Subsequently, this patient received intravenous topotecan instead of oral due to supply difficulties. After one administration of intravenous topotecan, we saw significant disease regression. Conclusion: This is to our knowledge the first reported case of better response of intravenous topotecan than oral topotecan. Multiple extrinsic (e.g., food, medication) factors were investigated but could not deliver an explanation.

Keywords

• topotecan
• oral administration
• intravenous administration
• small-cell lung cancer
• case report