Healthcare (Mar 2022)

Interaction between Work and Metabolic Syndrome: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study

  • Amália Ivine Costa Santana,
  • Magno Conceição das Merces,
  • Marcio Costa de Souza,
  • Bruno Gil de Carvalho Lima,
  • Maria José Quina Galdino,
  • Nuno Damácio de Carvalho Félix,
  • Lucelia Batista Neves Cunha Magalhães,
  • Julita Maria Freitas Coelho,
  • Paulo José Bastos Barbosa,
  • Érica Velasco Dias Gomes,
  • Rodrigo Fernandes Weyll Pimentel,
  • Anderson Reis de Sousa,
  • Márcia Aparecida Ferreira de Oliveira,
  • Aline Macêdo de Queiroz,
  • Raíssa Millena Silva Florencio,
  • Jorge Lopes Cavalcante Neto,
  • Antonio Marcos Tosoli Gomes,
  • Thadeu Borges Souza Santos,
  • Silvana Lima Vieira,
  • Danilo Guimarães de Sousa,
  • Priscila Cristina da Silva Thiengo de Andrade,
  • Isolda Prado de Negreiros Nogueira Maduro,
  • Sandra Lúcia Fernandes,
  • Kairo Silvestre Meneses Damasceno,
  • Dandara Almeida Reis da Silva,
  • Argemiro D’Oliveira Júnior

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10030544
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 3
p. 544

Abstract

Read online

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is a clinical condition and a relevant risk factor in the development of cardiovascular diseases; it occurs as a result of lifestyle factors, e.g., work. The aim of this research was to estimate the interaction between work and MS among primary health care (PHC) nursing professionals in the state of Bahia, Brazil. A sectional multicentered study carried out in 43 municipalities in Bahia, whose study population consisted of nursing professionals. The exposure variables were occupation, professional exhaustion, and working time, and the outcome variable was MS. Interaction measures based on the additivity criteria were verified by calculating the excess risks due to the interactions and according to the proportion of cases attributed to the interactions and the synergy index. The global MS prevalence is 24.4%. There was a greater magnitude in the exposure group regarding the three investigated factors (average level occupation, professional exhaustion, and working time in PHC for more than 5 years), reaching an occurrence of 44.9% when compared to the prevalence of 13.1% in the non-exposure group (academic education, without professional burnout, and working time in PHC for up to 5 years). The study’s findings showed a synergistic interaction of work aspects for MS occurrence among PHC nursing professionals.

Keywords