Frontiers in Communication (Oct 2023)

British and Irish newspapers implicitly support single-use masks over reusable face coverings

  • Anaïs Augé,
  • Thora Tenbrink,
  • Morwenna Spear,
  • Nathan Abrams

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1256349
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionThe environmental impact of waste caused by single-use masks or face coverings is an under-considered effect associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. The combination of the protective purpose of face masks and their potential environmental impacts through littering or waste management means the wearing of face masks is simultaneously associated with the health crisis and creation of a new environmental challenge, combining two strands of journalism.MethodsOur study demonstrates how the discourse in British and Irish newspapers in the March 2020-December 2021 time frame relates to this problem. By a combination of quantitative and qualitative discourse analysis, we identify concepts commonly associated with the terms “face-covering” and “mask,” particularly concerning whether they refer to a disposable or reusable item.ResultsResults suggest that the newspaper discourse generally favored references to single-use surgical masks. Newspapers reported on the environmental impact of face masks only in very limited ways.DiscussionWe propose that the increase in waste caused by face masks can be related to prevailing representations of single-use surgical masks and limited attention paid to environmental concerns.

Keywords