Scientific Reports (Feb 2024)

Centrality angle is a novel nephrometry score to predict tumor complexity and perioperative outcomes for partial nephrectomy

  • Shunsuke Miyamoto,
  • Keisuke Goto,
  • Ryo Tasaka,
  • Yuki Kohada,
  • Takafumi Fukushima,
  • Kenshiro Takemoto,
  • Takashi Babasaki,
  • Kohei Kobatake,
  • Yohei Sekino,
  • Hiroyuki Kitano,
  • Kenichiro Ikeda,
  • Keisuke Hieda,
  • Tetsutaro Hayashi,
  • Nobuyuki Hinata

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55448-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract To propose the centrality angle (C-angle) as a novel simple nephrometry score for the evaluation of tumor complexity and prediction of perioperative outcomes in nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for renal tumors. The analysis was based on 174 patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy retrospectively. C-angle was defined as the angle occupied by the tumor from the center of the kidney in the coronal CT images. Other nephrometry scores were calculated and compared with C-angle. Associations between C-angle and perioperative outcomes were examined. Significant differences were found in C-angle between tumors greater and less than 4 cm, exophytic and endophytic tumors, and hilar and non-hilar tumors. C-angle was correlated with other nephrometry scores, including RENAL, PADUA, and C-index. Significant positive correlations with WIT, operation time, and EBL, and significant negative correlations with preserved eGFR. C-angle could predict perioperative complications. Patients with a C-angle > 45° had worse perioperative outcomes, including longer operative time, longer WIT, lower rate of preserved eGFR, and complications. C-angle can be used to evaluate the complexity of renal tumors and predict perioperative outcomes. C-angle can potentially be used for decision-making in the treatment of patients and to guide surgical planning of NSS.