Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology (Oct 2021)

Analysis of Grip Amplitude on Velocity in Paralympic Powerlifting

  • Marcelo Danilllo Matos dos Santos,
  • Felipe J. Aidar,
  • Andres Armas Alejo,
  • Dihogo Gama de Matos,
  • Raphael Fabricio de Souza,
  • Paulo Francisco de Almeida-Neto,
  • Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinoco Cabral,
  • Pantelis Theo Nikolaidis,
  • Beat Knechtle,
  • Filipe Manuel Clemente,
  • Eugenia Murawska-Ciałowicz,
  • Georgian Badicu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk6040086
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 4
p. 86

Abstract

Read online

(1) Background: Paralympic Powerlifting (PP) is a Paralympic modality that is predominantly about developing maximal force, as there are athletes who lift three times their body weight. Our objective was to evaluate the averages of the velocity for 30% and 50% of 1 Maximum Repetition (1 RM) on different amplitudes of the footprint in PP athletes; (2) Methods: The intervention happened over two weeks, with the first being devoted to the familiarization and testing of 1 RM, while in the second week, through the use of a linear Encoder, tests of velocity average (VA), velocity average propulsive (VAP), and velocity peak (VP) were carried out with loads of 30% and 50% of a maximum repetition 1 RM for 1× of the biacromial distance (BAD) 1.3 × BAD, 1.5 × BAD; (3) Results: There was a significant difference in the average velocity of 1 × BAD (1.16 ± 0.14 m/s, 1.07–1.26 IC; η2p 0.20) when compared to 1.3 × BAD (1.00 ± 0.17 m/s, 0.90–1.09 IC; η2p 0.20) over 30% of 1 RM. For the other velocity variables for 30% and 50% of 1 RM with different grip amplitudes, there were no significant differences; (4) Conclusions: In PP, the 1 × BAD footprint contributes significantly to VA at 30% of 1 RM when compared to the 1.3 × BAD and 1.5 × BAD footprints. For loading at 50% of 1 RM the VA, VAP and VP decreased when compared to 30% of 1 RM, to the extent that the VAP and VP generated with the 1.3 × BAD and 1.5 × BAD footprints were higher than those with 1 × BAD, other than for VA 50% of 1 RM, where the 1 × BAD footprint was superior to the others.

Keywords