Zdravniški Vestnik (Dec 2006)
Incidental renal focal lesions: importance of radiological characterisation
Abstract
Background: Widespread routine use of cross-sectional imaging modalities (ultrasonography [US] and computed tomography [CT]) leads to incidental discovery of many focal lesions in kidneys. It is important that these lesions are correctly characterised since many of them represent malignancy. Incidentally discovered renal masses are often difficult to characterise because of their small size or complex morphology. Increasing numbers of renal cancers are discovered incidentally during imaging studies for other reasons; up to 40 % of those masses are smaller than 3cm. Together, US and CT are able to characterise up to 95 % of renal masses larger than 15mm. Bosniak classification proved to be very useful in distinguishing between benign and probably malignant cystic renal lesions. In small solid focal lesions, evidence of tumoral vascularity is crucial, since many of them represent small cancers. In CT, partial volume averaging can cause problems in detection of very small masses as well as their characterisation due to inacurate measurement of pre- and postcontrast density of the lesion. This can be overcome by using thin collimation and by modifying contrast administration protocols. Some hyperdense lesions are difficult to characterise because of sparse or non-opacification – they may represent hyperdense cystic mass or solid tumor (i. e. papillary renal cell carcinoma). US offers high-resolution imaging of cystic and complex masses and non-invasive asessment of vascularity. Considering high sensitivity and specificity rates of US and CT, angiography has a very limited value in diagnosis of small, cystic or poorly vascularized renal masses.Conclusions: How to manage patients with incidentally discovered small renal tumor? Small tumors (< 3 mm) rarely metastasize, are low grade and grow slowly. Therefore, in older or high-risk patients follow-up (watchful waiting) is an option. On the other hand, surgical tumor removal and follow-up is considered in younger patients. In many cases correct diagnostic and therapeutic decisions can only be achieved with collaboration of radiologist, urologist and pathologist.
