Comparison of syndromic versus laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Treponema palladium, infections at the selected health centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Abstract

Plain language summary Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are the leading infectious diseases worldwide, and the majority of cases are recorded in developing countries, including Ethiopia. However, diagnosis of STIs in most developing countries done syndromic based, since the laboratory-based tests are relatively expensive, need skilled manpower, and time taking. Therefore regular assessments on how closely related STIs syndromic versus laboratory-based diagnosis should be done, for the proper management of the diseases. In this regard, the present study demonstrated that there was no statistically significant difference between syndromic versus laboratory-based diagnosis of some certain STIs infections; Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Treponema palladium (TP), in selected public health centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. However, more than half of syndromic cases could not be confirmed by laboratory diagnosed tests. Thus, to narrow the gap between the two diagnostic approaches, regular training, updates, and similar studies need to cascade in the country. In the meantime, in other developing countries too, regular assessment on STIs syndromic versus laboratory-based diagnosis should be done, to control and prevent STIs infections worldwide.

Keywords

• Sexually transmitted infection
• Syndromic case management
• Laboratory-based approach