Bisphosphonates in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Review of Their Use and Complications

Abstract

Background: Considerable interest has been expressed in the use of bisphosphonates to treat periprosthetic osteoporosis with the clinical goals of reducing periprosthetic fractures and prolonging implant survival. Methods: A systematic review was performed with the goal of identifying both basic science and clinical studies related to the risks and benefits of bisphosphonate use in total joint arthroplasty. Results: Studies have shown that bisphosphonates may increase early bony ingrowth, decrease the postoperative loss of bone mineral density, and increase the longevity of implants by reducing the need for revisions secondary to aseptic loosening. Continuing bisphosphonates for 1 year postoperatively seems to provide the greatest benefit, with only marginal benefit being shown by continuing therapy for up to 2 years. Current data present some concerns for an increased risk of periprosthetic fractures especially in younger patients, and prolonged therapy is not recommended due to the potential risk of atypical femur fractures. Patients should be counseled regarding the risk of side effects of bisphosphonates, including the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw, which is a rare but serious side effect. They should also be counseled on the risk of atypical femur fractures and gastrointestinal intolerance. Conclusions: Orthopedic surgeons could consider bisphosphonates for up to 1 year postoperatively regardless of the patient’s prior bone mineral density, after discussion regarding the risks and benefits with the patient.

Keywords

• Bisphosphonates
• Arthroplasty revision
• Atypical fractures
• Periprosthetic fracture