Frontiers in Endocrinology (Apr 2022)

Hybrid Close-Loop Systems Versus Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend and Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A Single-Center Cohort Study

  • Maria Elena Lunati,
  • Paola Silvia Morpurgo,
  • Antonio Rossi,
  • Alessandra Gandolfi,
  • Irene Cogliati,
  • Andrea Mario Bolla,
  • Laura Plebani,
  • Luciana Vallone,
  • Laura Montefusco,
  • Ida Pastore,
  • Vincenzo Cimino,
  • Sabrina Argenti,
  • Graziella Volpi,
  • Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti,
  • Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti,
  • Paolo Fiorina,
  • Paolo Fiorina,
  • Paolo Fiorina

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.816599
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionPredictive low-glucose suspend (PLGS) and hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems may improve glucose control and quality of life in type 1 diabetic individuals. This is a cross-sectional, single-center study to compare the effect on metabolic control and glucose variability of PLGS and HCL systems as compared to standard sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 136 adults (men/women 69/67, mean age 47.3 ± 13.9 years) with T1D on insulin pump therapy, divided accordingly to type of insulin pump system (group 1: SAP, 24 subjects; group 2: PLGS, 49 subjects; group 3: HCL, 63 subjects). The groups were matched for age, gender, years of disease, years of CSII use, and CGM wear time.ResultsThe analysis of CGM metrics, in the three groups, showed a statistically significant different percentage of time within the target range, defined as 70–180 mg/dl, with a higher percentage in group 3 and significantly less time spent in the hypoglycemic range in groups 2 and 3. The three groups were statistically different also for the glucose management indicator and coefficient of variation percentage, which were progressively lower moving from group 1 to group 3. In the HCL group, 52.4% of subjects reached a percentage of time passed in the euglycemic range above 70%, as compared to 32.7% in those with PLGS and 20.2% in those with SAP. A positive correlation between the higher percentage of TIR and the use of auto-mode was evident in the HCL group. Finally, the three groups did not show any statistical differences regarding the quality-of-life questionnaire, but there was a significant negative correlation between CV and perceived CSII-use convenience (r = -0.207, p = 0.043).ConclusionHCL systems were more effective in improving glucose control and in reducing the risk of hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes, thereby mitigating risk for acute and chronic complications and positively affecting diabetes technologies’ acceptance.

Keywords